Academic Effectiveness Liaison Council
Date: October 27, 2009
Start Time: 2:00:00 PM
End Time: 3:00:00 PM
Dialing Instructions: 5707955
Origin: Pullman (French 442)
Location: Spokane (SHSB 260), Tri-Cities (TEST 228), Vancouver (VCLS 308J)
Details: Academic Effectiveness Liaison Council
Special Request: Room reserved from 12:00 – 12:30 for set up.
Donna Cofield 5-4854
1. Liaison identification update
· We have about half of our liaisons who have helped identify the point people for EACH of the programs in their college. These point people will be critical in our overall communication strategy. Remember, even if you plan on serving on point for each of the programs in your college, we need to be sure we know what and how many programs need to be identified.
2. Forum feedback on assessment process and rubric
· We have already learned enough and received good feedback on the rubrics. We will have a short version very shortly to complement the longer version, and there are other notable refinements gained from liaisons’ critical vantage. Keep the input coming!
3. Conversations and support for process.
· We have already received positive support from this effort from Old Dominion, Mount Royal, the University of Kentucky and Penn State who have heard of this work through the mock-up we presented with the TLT Group and are very interested in partnering with us (external review exchange).
· Conversation with leadership with the NWCC&U has been scheduled for later this week.
· The Western Cooperative of Educational Technologies already requested a presentation on this work for next year in La Jolla. (Who wants to go?)
4. We still need your participation in program contacts and doing the pilot Honors Self-Study assessment.
The task again:
1. Go to https://universityportfolio.wsu.edu/20082009/Pages/default.aspx
2. Scroll down to the link near the bottom ‘Honors Review Rubric’ which opens an online survey.
3. The first page of that link is instructions, at the bottom of which is a ‘begin’ button.
Remember, when we have worked through refinements, the goal of the work should provide with a new template for reporting that streamlines the rating. By writing reports in template ‘chunks,’ we will be able to concatenate each of them into various formats to address the different reporting requests we get from professional accreditors, the HEC Board, OFM, and anybody else who might appreciate WSU’s commitment to improving student learning.
- Print out a hard copy of the rubric (already being revised thanks to feedback at our forums).
- Read through it to get the flavor.
- Read the Honors Self Study
- Rate the study using the online survey/rubric. (You can cut and paste language from the rubric into the comment box on the rating form online, and that will help Honors understand the criteria you selected as important to your review of their self-study, and it will help us refine the rubric.)
In the news Today:
October 26, 2009, 02:53 PM ET
Most Colleges Try to Assess Student Learning, Survey Finds
A large majority of American colleges make at least some formal effort to assess their students’ learning, but most have few or no staff members dedicated to doing so. Those are among the findings of a survey report released Monday by the National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment, a year-old project based at Indiana University and the University of Illinois. Of more than 1,500 provosts’ offices that responded to the survey, nearly two-thirds said their institutions had two or fewer employees assigned to student assessment. Among large research universities, almost 80 percent cited a lack of faculty engagement as the most serious barrier to student-assessment projects.